Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joao Coelho de Souza
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:53, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Joao Coelho de Souza (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The page has been draftified twice 1 2, which makes this the third time the article has been created. As AfD is the listed method of dispute resolution over draftification (WP:DRAFTOBJECT), I am listing it here – this seems to still be unfit for mainspace. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 16:55, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 16:55, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 16:55, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:18, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: No WP:V whatsoever. Doesn't meet WP:MINIMUM. Also, the creator contributions rise some red flags. They created several one-line unsourced article. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 01:37, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:59, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.