Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China's Four Most Handsome Men
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 04:57, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- China's Four Most Handsome Men (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
None of the references mention this subject. This link just says "Pretty men in history", lists 5 men and doesn't mention Song Yu. Four Beauties is a well-known group in traditional Chinese culture, "four most handsome men" isn't, and I can't find any reputable reference grouping these 4 men together. (There's no zh.wiki article either.) PS: Page creator has been blocked for sock-puppetry. Timmyshin (talk) 15:23, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:53, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:53, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:53, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. I note that on the Chinese wikipedia page for one of the four their is a redlink to a chinese page for this topic: zh:Special:链入页面/四大美男. So, while this page currently seems to fail WP:V, etc. I could be wrong. Smmurphy(Talk) 19:14, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- That redlink was added earlier this year and also unreferenced. [1] Timmyshin (talk) 01:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete WP:SYNTH and sock creation. D4iNa4 (talk) 13:35, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.